Assessing the Opportunity-Honest Pros and Cons
Honestly evaluate whether lead generation fits your capital, skills, and risk tolerance. Use decision frameworks and market sizing exercises to identify genuine opportunities versus saturated markets.
Chapter 7 provides the honest evaluation too many aspiring lead generators skip. The industry absolutely offers opportunity-but not for everyone, and not through every path. Accurate self-assessment before commitment prevents the expensive discovery that you entered the wrong business.
Capital requirements define initial options. Affiliates need $5,000-25,000 minimum-enough for testing campaigns and surviving the learning curve. Direct publishers require $25,000-100,000 to develop landing pages, establish traffic sources, and weather initial optimization. Brokers need $100,000-500,000+ because the float eats capital. Networks require $250,000-1M for technology infrastructure. Platforms need $500,000-2M+ for serious technology and go-to-market investment.
Skills assessment spans five dimensions: marketing ability, data analysis, technology comfort, sales capability, and compliance knowledge. Personality fit proves surprisingly important-lead generation rewards those comfortable with ambiguity, who enjoy data-driven optimization, and who can maintain emotional equilibrium during volatile periods.
Risk tolerance varies by model. Publishers face traffic risk-platforms change algorithms, costs increase, accounts get suspended. Brokers face inventory and credit risk. Time horizons differ by path: affiliates can reach profitability in 3-6 months, direct publishers in 6-12 months, brokers in 12-18 months. The chapter concludes with go/no-go decision frameworks synthesizing capital, skills, fit, and opportunity into clear recommendations.