The technology that promised to recover abandoning visitors has matured, adapted, and remains relevant for lead generators who implement it correctly.
Exit intent popups remain one of the most debated conversion optimization tactics in lead generation. Critics call them intrusive. Advocates point to conversion data showing 2-4% additional lead capture from visitors who would otherwise leave empty-handed. Understanding how these tools fit into your broader first-party data strategies helps contextualize their value. Both perspectives contain truth.
The question is not whether exit intent popups work. The question is whether they work for your specific situation, and whether the implementation costs – both technical and experiential – justify the incremental leads they capture.
This guide examines exit intent technology through the lens of lead generation in 2026. We will cover the detection mechanisms, the current effectiveness data, the mobile challenge, the user experience trade-offs, and the testing frameworks that separate profitable implementations from conversion theater.
The Technology Behind Exit Intent Detection
Exit intent detection works by monitoring user behavior and triggering an intervention at the moment visitors appear ready to leave. Understanding the detection mechanisms clarifies both the capabilities and limitations of this technology.
Desktop Detection Methods
On desktop browsers, exit intent relies primarily on cursor tracking. The detection algorithm monitors mouse movements and triggers when the cursor trajectory indicates departure. The primary signals include rapid upward mouse movement toward the browser’s address bar or tab area, cursor moving toward the browser’s close button, and velocity patterns consistent with navigation away from the page rather than within it.
The technical implementation uses JavaScript event listeners for mouse position and movement. When the cursor crosses a defined threshold – typically the upper 10-20% of the viewport – the system triggers the popup display.
Modern exit intent scripts have become more sophisticated than early implementations. Current detection can distinguish between users moving to type in the address bar versus users moving to click within the page content. False positive rates have decreased as algorithms incorporate velocity, acceleration, and directional patterns rather than simple position thresholds.
Some implementations add secondary signals to improve accuracy. These include page dwell time (triggering only after sufficient engagement), scroll depth (ensuring the visitor has consumed content), and prior interaction patterns (distinguishing engaged visitors from immediate bouncers).
Mobile Detection Challenges
Mobile devices present a fundamental detection challenge: there is no cursor to track. Exit intent on mobile must rely on entirely different behavioral signals, and these signals are inherently less reliable.
Mobile exit intent typically monitors scroll behavior – specifically, rapid scrolling upward toward the address bar area. The assumption is that visitors scrolling quickly to the top of the page may be preparing to navigate away or access browser controls.
Other mobile triggers include switching to a different browser tab, extended periods of inactivity (suggesting the user may have been distracted or has abandoned the session), and orientation changes in some implementations.
The reliability of mobile detection varies significantly across devices and browsers. iOS Safari behaves differently than Chrome for Android. Samsung Internet introduces additional variation. The result is that mobile exit intent triggers with lower precision than desktop, producing both more false positives (triggering when users are not actually leaving) and more false negatives (missing genuine exit attempts).
According to research from Sleeknote analyzing over 26,000 campaigns, mobile popups actually outperform desktop popups in raw conversion rate – 5.60% on mobile versus 2.86% on desktop. However, this data reflects all popup types, not specifically exit intent. The mobile advantage likely stems from the full-screen nature of mobile popups rather than superior exit detection.
Browser and Privacy Considerations
Modern browsers increasingly restrict the behaviors that exit intent scripts rely upon. Safari’s Intelligent Tracking Prevention, Firefox’s Enhanced Tracking Protection, and Chrome’s Privacy Sandbox all affect script execution and data access in ways that can interfere with exit intent functionality.
The most direct impact comes from script blocking. Many exit intent implementations rely on third-party JavaScript from popup platform providers. Ad blockers and privacy extensions frequently block these scripts entirely, preventing exit intent from functioning for a segment of visitors. Estimates suggest 25-35% of desktop visitors use some form of ad or script blocking.
For lead generators, this means exit intent popups reach perhaps 65-75% of desktop traffic rather than all visitors. The economics of implementation must account for this reduced addressable audience.
Effectiveness Data: What the Numbers Actually Show
Exit intent popup effectiveness varies dramatically based on implementation quality, offer relevance, and audience characteristics. The range is so wide that average conversion rates provide limited guidance – but they establish baseline expectations.
Conversion Rate Benchmarks
Industry research provides the following benchmarks for popup conversion rates generally. The average popup conversion rate across all types is approximately 3-4% according to data from Sleeknote’s analysis of 26,270 campaigns. This encompasses all popup triggers, not just exit intent.
Exit intent popups specifically tend to perform at the lower end of this range for most implementations – typically 2-4% conversion of visitors who see the popup. The logic is straightforward: these are visitors who have already decided to leave. Reversing that decision is harder than engaging an interested visitor earlier in the session.
However, the calculation that matters is incremental leads, not popup conversion rate. A 2% conversion rate on exit intent means you capture 2% of visitors who would otherwise generate zero leads. At 10,000 monthly visitors with a 3% site-wide conversion rate, you generate 300 leads. If 6,000 visitors leave without converting (60% of traffic), and exit intent captures 2% of those departing visitors, you add 120 leads – a 40% increase in total lead volume.
The math becomes compelling at scale, provided the leads are legitimate and the user experience cost does not damage the 300 leads you would have captured anyway.
Gamification Impact
Some popup implementations incorporate gamification elements – spin-to-win wheels, scratch cards, or quiz formats. The data suggests these significantly outperform static popup designs.
Research from Sleeknote found that spin-to-win popups achieved 8.67% conversion rates compared to 3.70% for non-gamified popups – a 132% improvement. Daily offer popups reached 29.59% average conversion. Quiz-based popups averaged 8.65%.
The relevance for lead generation is mixed. Gamification works well for email capture where the primary barrier is apathy. For lead generation requiring phone numbers and substantial information, gamification may generate lower-quality leads who engage for the game rather than the service.
Design Element Impact
Visual design choices significantly affect popup performance. Research findings indicate that popups with images convert at 4.05% versus 0.66% for those without images – a 513% difference. Countdown timers improved conversion by 25.48%. Teaser elements (small tabs that preview the popup) boosted performance by 65.69%.
These findings suggest that exit intent popups deserve the same design attention as landing pages. A hastily designed popup with generic messaging wastes the intervention opportunity.
The User Experience Trade-Off
Exit intent popups exist in tension with user experience principles. Understanding this tension – and navigating it thoughtfully – determines whether implementations succeed long-term.
The Nielsen Norman Research
Nielsen Norman Group, the influential UX research firm, has documented significant user frustration with popups. Their research captures users who “rapidly dismiss popups without reading them” and found that modal overlays “damage credibility and trust.”
One telling observation: a research participant became so frustrated with consecutive popups that he “tossed his phone across the table” and abandoned the website entirely. While extreme, this reaction illustrates the emotional response popups can trigger.
The research identifies timing as the critical issue. Users strongly dislike popups appearing before main page content loads, immediately after login, during critical tasks, and before they have interacted with content meaningfully.
Exit intent popups theoretically avoid some of these concerns by triggering only as visitors leave. But implementation matters. An exit intent popup that fires on first scroll-up – before the visitor has consumed any content – creates the same frustration as an immediate popup.
The Short-Term Metrics Trap
A core tension exists between short-term metrics and long-term trust. Popups generate measurable conversions today, but the experience may cost unmeasurable brand damage tomorrow.
Nielsen Norman researchers note that sites use premature email-collection popups because they yield “short-term uptick in metrics” at “the price of frustrating many users who are not motivated by arbitrary incentives.”
For lead generation specifically, this trade-off warrants careful consideration. Lead generation depends on trust – visitors must believe their information will be handled appropriately. Aggressive popup implementations that frustrate visitors may convert at acceptable rates while simultaneously reducing overall form completions or increasing lead return rates as frustrated submitters become unresponsive to follow-up contact.
The 25-Popup Reality
One Nielsen Norman researcher captured “on average, 25 popups per week” during personal observation, highlighting the pervasive nature of popup experiences across the web. Your visitors encounter dozens of popups on other sites. Each adds to cumulative popup fatigue that reduces the effectiveness of your implementation.
This fatigue effect means exit intent popup effectiveness likely declines over time as web users develop increasingly automatic popup dismissal reflexes. The 3-4% conversion rates documented today may compress as popup saturation continues.
Mobile-Specific Considerations
With mobile traffic representing 60-80% of lead generation visitors in most verticals, mobile exit intent implementation deserves focused attention.
The Detection Problem
As discussed, mobile exit intent detection is fundamentally less accurate than desktop. Without cursor tracking, mobile detection relies on behavioral proxies that correlate imperfectly with exit intent.
Rapid upward scrolling – the most common mobile trigger – captures some genuine exit attempts but also triggers false positives when users scroll to review content they have already read. Tab switching detection requires specific browser API access that varies across mobile browsers and may be restricted by privacy features.
The practical impact: mobile exit intent popups fire at less optimal moments than desktop equivalents, reducing conversion rates and increasing user irritation.
Mobile Popup Display
When mobile popups do display, they face different UX constraints than desktop. Mobile screens have limited real estate, making popups inherently more intrusive. A popup that overlays 40% of a desktop screen covers 100% of a mobile screen.
This full-screen nature has mixed implications. The popup commands complete attention, potentially increasing conversion rates. But it also blocks all content and navigation, increasing the perceived intrusiveness and the likelihood of immediate dismissal.
Mobile popups must be designed specifically for mobile interaction patterns. Minimum tap targets of 44-48 pixels for close buttons and form fields. Easy dismissal (tapping outside the popup should close it). Minimal form fields appropriate for thumb typing. Clear value proposition visible without scrolling within the popup.
Google’s Intrusive Interstitial Penalty
Google penalizes sites using intrusive interstitials on mobile in ways that affect search rankings. While exit intent popups that trigger only on exit attempts are generally not subject to this penalty (since they do not block content on arrival), implementation matters.
If your exit intent detection fires too easily – triggering popups for users who are not actually leaving – Google may classify the popup as an intrusive interstitial. The ranking penalty affects organic search visibility, potentially costing more traffic than the popup captures.
For lead generators relying heavily on organic traffic, this represents a significant implementation risk. Conservative exit intent thresholds that accept some false negatives to avoid false positives may protect organic rankings. Balancing this with your landing page optimization strategy ensures you are not sacrificing organic visibility for marginal popup conversions.
Best Practices for Lead Generation Implementation
Exit intent popups work best when treated as a strategic intervention rather than a default feature. The following practices improve outcomes.
Offer Relevance
The exit intent popup must offer something the visitor actually wants. Generic “Wait, before you go…” messaging converts poorly because it provides no compelling reason to stop.
Effective exit intent offers for lead generation include additional information relevant to the visitor’s query (comparison guides, calculators, checklists), reduced commitment alternatives (email-only instead of phone, smaller initial ask), specific incentives tied to taking action (priority callback, exclusive access), and urgency or scarcity that addresses why acting now matters.
The offer should acknowledge that the visitor was leaving and provide a reason why staying – or providing contact information – serves their interests. A popup saying “Get 20% off” on a lead generation form makes no sense. A popup saying “Still comparing options? Get our free rate comparison guide before you decide” aligns with visitor intent.
Timing and Frequency Controls
Exit intent should not trigger immediately or repeatedly. Reasonable controls include minimum time on page (30-60 seconds) before exit intent can trigger, minimum scroll depth (25-50% of page) to ensure content engagement, maximum one popup per session to avoid frustration, and cookie-based suppression to prevent repeat visitors from seeing the same popup.
These controls reduce popup volume but improve conversion quality. Visitors who trigger exit intent after 5 seconds on page are bounces – unlikely to convert under any circumstance. Visitors who spent 90 seconds and scrolled through 75% of content before leaving are genuinely interested prospects worth intercepting.
Form Simplicity
Exit intent popups capture visitors at their lowest commitment moment. These visitors have already decided to leave. Any friction in the popup form compounds their reluctance.
For lead generation, this means minimizing required fields. Email-only capture may make sense for exit intent even if your primary form requires phone number. A partial lead captured for nurturing is better than no lead at all. Just ensure any email addresses captured go through proper email verification services before adding to nurture sequences.
If phone number is essential for lead value, consider a two-step approach: capture email via the exit intent popup, then use immediate follow-up email to request phone number. This distributed capture process respects the visitor’s low-commitment moment while still attempting to gather necessary information.
Design Quality
Exit intent popups deserve professional design treatment. Research shows images improve conversion by over 500% compared to text-only popups. Clear visual hierarchy, readable fonts, appropriate contrast, and trust signals all affect popup performance.
The popup should visually match your site’s design language. A jarring popup that looks like it was pasted from a different website triggers suspicion. Visual consistency reinforces legitimacy.
Close button placement matters significantly. The X should be clearly visible and easy to click or tap. Hiding or minimizing the close button increases popup view time but damages trust and may violate accessibility standards.
A/B Testing Strategies for Exit Intent
Exit intent popups are testable like any conversion element. Systematic testing improves performance over time.
What to Test
Headline and value proposition. The primary message drives most of the conversion variation. Test specific versus general benefits, different offer types, and urgency language.
Offer type. Compare content offers (guides, tools) versus commitment reduction (email-only capture) versus incentives (priority service). The optimal offer varies by vertical and traffic source.
Timing triggers. Test different minimum engagement thresholds – time on page, scroll depth, and pages visited. More restrictive triggers reduce volume but may improve conversion rate and lead quality.
Visual design. Test image versus no image, different imagery concepts, color schemes, and popup size. Remember the research showing 500%+ improvement from images.
Form fields. Test single-field versus multi-field capture. For lead generation, test email-only versus email plus phone versus full contact information.
Statistical Significance
Exit intent tests require careful sample size calculation because popup view rates are a fraction of site traffic. If 60% of visitors leave without converting, and exit intent fires for 50% of those (accounting for timing restrictions), only 30% of site traffic sees the popup.
A site with 10,000 monthly visitors might show the exit intent popup to 3,000 visitors. At 3% popup conversion, that produces 90 conversions monthly. Detecting a meaningful difference between two popup variants at 95% confidence requires patience.
Calculate required sample sizes before launching tests. For most lead generators, exit intent A/B tests should run for at least 2-4 weeks to achieve statistical significance. Resist the temptation to declare winners based on early directional data.
Testing Priority
The testing hierarchy for exit intent mirrors general conversion optimization. Test structural elements first (whether to show exit intent at all, basic trigger conditions), then messaging and offer, then design and visual elements, then minor copy variations.
Starting with button color tests while your popup shows no image and offers generic messaging wastes testing capacity on low-impact variables.
Implementation Options
Exit intent functionality can be implemented through dedicated popup platforms, built into existing landing page tools, or custom-developed.
Third-Party Popup Platforms
Dedicated popup tools like OptinMonster, Sleeknote, Privy, Justuno, and OptiMonk offer exit intent as a core feature. These platforms provide pre-built templates, drag-and-drop editors, A/B testing functionality, and integrations with email marketing and CRM systems.
Advantages include rapid implementation (often hours rather than days), no development resources required, and built-in analytics. Disadvantages include ongoing subscription costs ($20-200+ monthly depending on traffic volume), potential page speed impact from additional scripts, and reliance on third-party cookies that may be blocked by browser privacy features.
For most lead generators, third-party platforms represent the practical choice. The development cost of custom exit intent implementation rarely justifies itself unless you have specific requirements these platforms cannot meet.
Landing Page Builder Features
Many landing page builders now include exit intent functionality. Unbounce, Leadpages, Instapage, and similar platforms offer popup capabilities including exit intent triggers.
If you already use these platforms, leveraging built-in exit intent may be simpler than adding a separate popup tool. The trade-off is typically fewer customization options and less sophisticated A/B testing compared to dedicated popup platforms.
Custom Development
Custom exit intent development makes sense for organizations with specific technical requirements, concerns about third-party script dependencies, or the need to integrate deeply with proprietary systems.
Custom implementation requires JavaScript development to handle mouse and scroll event monitoring, threshold detection, popup display logic, session and cookie management, and analytics integration.
The exit intent detection itself is not complex – the core logic requires perhaps 50-100 lines of JavaScript. The complexity lies in edge case handling, cross-browser compatibility, mobile implementation, and integration with your broader marketing technology stack.
Measuring Exit Intent Effectiveness
Proper measurement determines whether exit intent justifies its implementation and experience costs.
Primary Metrics
Exit intent conversion rate. Leads captured divided by popup impressions. The baseline to beat is roughly 2-4% for most implementations.
Incremental lead volume. Total leads from exit intent popup divided by total leads from all sources. This reveals exit intent’s contribution to overall lead flow. Track this alongside your GA4 lead generation tracking to understand the full picture.
Lead quality from exit intent. Contact rate, qualification rate, and sale conversion rate for exit intent leads compared to leads from primary forms. If exit intent leads convert at dramatically lower rates downstream, the incremental volume may have limited value.
Secondary Metrics
Bounce rate impact. Monitor whether exit intent implementation correlates with changes in overall site bounce rate. Exit intent should not increase bounces – if anything, it should reduce them by capturing departing visitors.
Page speed impact. Additional JavaScript affects load time. Monitor Core Web Vitals before and after implementation. If exit intent scripts add 500+ milliseconds to load time, the performance cost may exceed the conversion benefit.
Return rate for exit intent leads. In verticals where buyers can return leads, track return rates for exit intent leads specifically. Higher return rates suggest the leads are lower quality or less committed.
Cohort Analysis
Compare cohorts exposed to exit intent with cohorts who were not (during controlled tests or platform outages). The comparison should examine not just immediate conversion but downstream metrics including contact rate, sale conversion rate, customer lifetime value, and cancellation or complaint rates.
If exit intent leads show significantly worse downstream performance, the tactic may generate leads that cost more to work than they are worth.
Exit Intent in 2026: The Verdict
Exit intent popups remain a valid conversion optimization tactic in 2026, but their effectiveness is more contingent than ever on implementation quality.
The technology works. Detection algorithms have improved. Design options have expanded. Integration capabilities are mature. A well-implemented exit intent popup can capture 2-4% of departing visitors, representing meaningful incremental lead volume.
But the context has shifted. Users are more popup-fatigued than ever. Privacy tools block scripts at higher rates. Mobile dominates traffic while mobile exit detection remains imprecise. Google penalizes intrusive implementations. The bar for earning attention has risen.
Those who succeed with exit intent in 2026 share common characteristics. They treat exit intent as a strategic intervention rather than a default feature. They invest in design quality rather than generic templates. They offer genuine value rather than desperate “wait, don’t go” messaging. They measure downstream lead quality rather than celebrating popup conversion rates. They test systematically rather than setting and forgetting.
For lead generation specifically, exit intent works best when the popup offer acknowledges the visitor’s comparison mindset, provides value that serves the visitor’s decision process, captures minimal information appropriate for the low-commitment moment, leads to appropriate follow-up that respects the prospect’s partial engagement, and maintains brand trust rather than triggering skepticism.
The question is not “Do exit intent popups work?” They do, for some implementations, for some audiences, with some offers. The question is whether you will implement exit intent with the care it requires – or whether you will add another forgettable popup to visitors’ weekly tally of interruptions. Combined with the five-minute rule for response time, even a modest number of exit intent captures can generate meaningful revenue when handled properly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an exit intent popup and how does it work?
An exit intent popup is a website overlay that displays when a visitor shows behavioral signals of leaving the page. On desktop, detection typically monitors cursor movement toward the browser’s close button, address bar, or tab area. When the cursor trajectory suggests departure, the popup triggers. On mobile, detection relies on alternative signals like rapid upward scrolling or tab switching. The technology aims to deliver a final message or offer to visitors who would otherwise leave without converting.
What is a good conversion rate for exit intent popups?
Industry benchmarks suggest 2-4% conversion rates for exit intent popups specifically, with general popup conversion rates averaging 3-4% across all trigger types. However, the more meaningful metric is incremental lead capture – the additional leads generated from visitors who would otherwise leave without converting. A 2% conversion rate on exit intent can represent significant additional volume when applied to the 60-70% of visitors who typically leave lead generation sites without converting.
Do exit intent popups work on mobile devices?
Exit intent functionality on mobile is limited by detection capabilities. Without cursor tracking, mobile exit intent relies on behavioral proxies like rapid upward scrolling toward the address bar. These signals are less reliable than desktop cursor tracking, resulting in more false positives (triggering when users are not actually leaving) and false negatives (missing genuine exit attempts). Despite detection limitations, mobile popups generally can achieve strong conversion rates – research shows 5.60% average for mobile versus 2.86% for desktop – though this reflects all popup types, not specifically exit intent.
Does Google penalize exit intent popups?
Google penalizes intrusive interstitials on mobile that block content when users first arrive. Exit intent popups that trigger only on genuine exit attempts generally avoid this penalty since they do not block content on arrival. However, if exit intent detection fires too easily – triggering for users who are not actually leaving – Google may classify the popup as an intrusive interstitial. Conservative detection thresholds help avoid this risk while protecting organic search rankings.
How do exit intent popups affect user experience?
Exit intent popups exist in tension with user experience principles. Research from Nielsen Norman Group documents significant user frustration with popups, with users rapidly dismissing them without reading and modal overlays damaging credibility and trust. The key factors affecting user experience are timing (triggering too early frustrates users), frequency (showing the popup repeatedly damages trust), offer relevance (generic messaging annoys while valuable offers are tolerated), and ease of dismissal (hidden close buttons trigger skepticism).
What should I offer in an exit intent popup for lead generation?
Effective exit intent offers for lead generation include additional information relevant to the visitor’s research (comparison guides, calculators, industry reports), reduced commitment alternatives (email-only capture when your primary form requires phone number), specific value propositions tied to action (priority callback, exclusive access, extended consultation), and urgency elements that address why acting now benefits the visitor. The offer should acknowledge that the visitor was leaving and provide a compelling reason why staying or providing contact information serves their interests.
How do I A/B test exit intent popups effectively?
Exit intent A/B testing requires patience because popup view rates are a fraction of site traffic. Calculate required sample sizes before launching tests – most exit intent tests need 2-4 weeks minimum to achieve statistical significance. Test structural elements first (whether to show exit intent at all), then messaging and offer, then design elements. Monitor not just popup conversion rates but downstream metrics like contact rate, sale conversion, and lead quality. A popup that converts well but produces low-quality leads may not justify its implementation.
Should I show exit intent popups to returning visitors?
Generally, no. Returning visitors who dismissed your exit intent popup previously should not see it again. Cookie or browser storage-based suppression prevents repeat exposure that damages trust and triggers frustration. Some implementations show different exit intent offers to returning visitors – for example, a first visit might offer a guide while a return visit offers direct phone consultation. This requires additional development but can capture value from multiple visit patterns.
What is the difference between exit intent and timed popups?
Exit intent popups trigger based on behavioral signals suggesting the visitor is about to leave – cursor movement toward exit, rapid scrolling upward, or tab switching. Timed popups trigger after a specific duration on page, regardless of exit behavior. Exit intent theoretically addresses visitors who have already decided to leave, while timed popups interrupt visitors who may still be engaged. Research suggests timer-led triggers convert at 4.42% compared to 2.64% for scroll-based triggers, though the optimal approach varies by site and audience.
How do I measure if exit intent popups are worth the effort?
Measure exit intent effectiveness through multiple lenses. Track popup conversion rate (leads from popup divided by popup impressions) against the 2-4% benchmark. Calculate incremental lead volume as a percentage of total leads. Compare lead quality metrics (contact rate, qualification rate, sale conversion) for exit intent leads versus leads from primary forms. Monitor for negative effects including bounce rate changes, page speed impact, and any increase in lead return rates. The tactic is worthwhile when incremental leads justify implementation costs without degrading overall site performance or lead quality.
Key Takeaways
-
Exit intent popups can capture 2-4% of departing visitors, representing meaningful incremental lead volume when applied to the 60-70% of visitors who typically leave lead generation sites without converting.
-
Desktop exit intent detection using cursor tracking is significantly more reliable than mobile detection, which relies on behavioral proxies like scroll patterns. Mobile implementations require adjusted expectations and conservative trigger thresholds.
-
User experience research documents substantial popup fatigue among web users, with pervasive popup exposure across sites reducing tolerance for any individual implementation. Quality and relevance matter more than ever.
-
Design elements significantly affect popup performance – research shows popups with images convert at 4.05% versus 0.66% without images, a 500%+ improvement that justifies investing in popup design quality.
-
The offer must provide genuine value relevant to the visitor’s decision process. Generic “wait, don’t go” messaging converts poorly because it provides no compelling reason for departing visitors to re-engage.
-
Timing controls are essential – minimum engagement thresholds (time on page, scroll depth) ensure popups trigger for genuinely engaged visitors rather than immediate bounces unlikely to convert under any circumstance.
-
Exit intent A/B testing requires patience due to lower sample sizes. Most tests need 2-4 weeks to achieve statistical significance. Test structural elements and offers before visual design details.
-
Measure downstream lead quality, not just popup conversion rates. Exit intent leads that convert at dramatically lower rates downstream may generate volume with limited business value.
-
Privacy tools and script blockers prevent exit intent from reaching an estimated 25-35% of desktop visitors, reducing the addressable audience for this tactic.
-
Implementation through third-party popup platforms is practical for most lead generators, offering rapid deployment and built-in testing at manageable subscription costs.